-Bye- So. Appearently I am now catagorized as a ..

ð

· 0 · 1393625909

Don't leave please

· 0 · 1393626363

@RenesmeeCarlieCullen what did I do?

· 0 · 1393626471

@Burrfoot never mind...

· 0 · 1393626577

@RenesmeeCarlieCullen I'm on it

· 0 · 1393626720

It's better than my crap

· 0 · 1393630651

@Burrfoot what is with your "ð" comment? You want her to leave? Talk about cyberbullying.

· 0 · 1393710046

@paraleah yup. Clearly I have a 'meltdown' when some idiot insults me. No, that is not what this is. Burrfoots an ass. He goes around telling people crap. I never read whatever thing honza posted, because I dont care. Only those people who think they are doing somethig good for the app care about it. They ought to have better things to do rather then going around to every post assessing if it is worthy of their little paradice. If honza really cared all that much, he would tell every person who did post something himself, not hire evil people to do his work. The fact is, though they think they are adults, they act like children who cant get what they want and dont know how to say something without being heartless. Being heartless is my job, not theirs.

· 0 · 1393716141

I know. I did a tweet, put it in the tweet category ad then "read honzas post about spam" it's so childish! If you think your such a stuck up goody two shoes then go an find somewhere else! @flaming

· 0 · 1393744784

You as in burrfoot

· 0 · 1393744807

@flaming you still here?.. Grow up.. @paraleah it is not bullying to post a rule previously posted by the owner. That's. All. I. Did.. Heyho it's been deleted but here it is again so you can read it too @ElsaofArrendale

· 0 · 1393746135

Could you all please read @Honza 's post a few months ago called 'Opuss Rules - Please Read' .. Then go to the opuss website and read the terms and conditions.. Opuss is not a message board, please use another medium to contact each other.. Or use the comment sections of old posts on opuss to communicate. Please stop spamming with shout outs and irrelevant noncontent. Thank you.

· 0 · 1393746141

NO shout outs please, if you need to contact your friend use other services like email and so on! Your shout out is not a genuine article and you are getting better rank for absolutely no work at all and it's not fair!' - @Honza 2013

· 0 · 1393746163

If there's a catergory then I don't give a toss @Burrfoot

· 0 · 1393749616

@ElsaofArrendale ð

· 0 · 1393750167

Eh???

· 0 · 1393750414

@Burrfoot

· 0 · 1393750418

Omg, what Burr is trying to getacross is to read the terms and conditions and the opuss rules, which is one of Honzas first opusses. They're is a category for tweets, but that's when Adam(seamonster) owned opuss, he made it with tweets, but opuss changed hands about 5, 6 months ago, so them are the opuss rules you need to follow as Adam does not own opuss anymore. So you MUST abide by Honzas rules and not the old ones, opuss nearly shut down. And Adam nearly deleted the app. If you want to know more about all of us nearly losing opuss go on the account Seamonster, he is the creator and founder of opuss. What I'm trying to say is, opuss used to be owned by Adam, and he sold it to Honza, so Adams rules no longer apply to us, but Honzas do. If you are going about 'well, the category should be deleted then!' Think about Honza, he is trying to get the app back on its feet, it's a free app, it costs a lot to run per year and he is trying his best, the last thing on his mind is deleting a category that he has clearly said is against the rules. It will probably be removed one day, but for now, we are all glad that we actually have an opuss app. @ElsaofArrendale @Honza and please stop being horrible to burr and saying you will leave, and Kelly, he is saying goodbye. ----The terms and conditions are Adams, last time I checked----

· 0 · 1393753323

Omg, what Burr is trying to getacross is to read the terms and conditions and the opuss rules, which is one of Honzas first opusses. They're is a category for tweets, but that's when Adam(seamonster) owned opuss, he made it with tweets, but opuss changed hands about 5, 6 months ago, so them are the opuss rules you need to follow as Adam does not own opuss anymore. So you MUST abide by Honzas rules and not the old ones, opuss nearly shut down. And Adam nearly deleted the app. If you want to know more about all of us nearly losing opuss go on the account Seamonster, he is the creator and founder of opuss. What I'm trying to say is, opuss used to be owned by Adam, and he sold it to Honza, so Adams rules no longer apply to us, but Honzas do. If you are going about 'well, the category should be deleted then!' Think about Honza, he is trying to get the app back on its feet, it's a free app, it costs a lot to run per year and he is trying his best, the last thing on his mind is deleting a category that he has clearly said is against the rules. It will probably be removed one day, but for now, we are all glad that we actually have an opuss app.   @ElsaofArrendale @Honza and please stop being horrible to burr and saying you will leave, and Kelly, he is saying goodbye. ----The terms and conditions are Adams, last time I checked----

And also, it says you have to click on work you love not on your own groups.

· 0 · 1393754903

It's there so it's still doable so I don't care. @lelo

· 0 · 1393757857

@ElsaofArrendale Well it's against the opuss rules, Kelly.

· 0 · 1393758347

@Mystical

· 0 · 1393759018

(Don't use my real name!) @lelo

· 0 · 1393759177

I agree that you can't just make it against the rules to use a certain category. The category is there. It's a part of Opuss. If you don't like tweets. Just stop reading them. And @Honza. If you don't want the tweets category to be there anymore. Just update the app, with the category removed. Don't start telling people what to post, and what not to post. You run the app, so you have a responsibility. When the app is on the appstore, and people can login, it doesn't just belong to you anymore. It also belongs to the users. What we do with it is what makes it worthy of its own existence.

· 0 · 1393761917

@Burrfoot but this post isn't a shout out.... All @flaming did was write a few stories and blog... I don't see any issues.

· 0 · 1393774376

@paraleah the post I commented honza's rules upon was something like 'a shout out to my friends' and came at a time when I was trying to persuade folk to stop using opuss as a message board. The post has been deleted and I can't remember what exactly it said. It wasn't a personal attack in any way.

· 0 · 1393774774

@DuRoLuRo to some degree you are right.. However the owner and person risking their money has creative control over the vision they have for their app. It can evolve as opuss has done in many ways.. However, the tweet section is a part of opuss' past. Honza and team have not got the funds to implement all the changes they want to, hence his previous post directing users as to the vision he has for creative content.. To encourage new users to join who will continue to post original creative content, there has to be a precedent of such content.. Otherwise it will attract similar content and become another tweetathon message board of 'hi'.. The other aspect is the unfortunate ranking system we have here.. By posting 20 tweets and shout out a day users so inclined will quickly break into the top ten and then it becomes a race to post anything just to achieve a rank.. This in turn shows opuss in a poor light.. Potential investors or prospective new users looking on will see a substandard copy of twitter instead of the talented mix of opuss at its best.

· 0 · 1393775400

@DuRoLuRo to some degree you are right.. However the owner and person risking their money has creative control over the vision they have for their app. It can evolve as opuss has done in many ways.. However, the tweet section is a part of opuss' past. Honza and team have not got the funds to implement all the changes they want to, hence his previous post directing users as to the vision he has for creative content.. To encourage new users to join who will continue to post original creative content, there has to be a precedent of such content.. Otherwise it will attract similar content and become another tweetathon message board of 'hi'.. The other aspect is the unfortunate ranking system we have here.. By posting 20 tweets and shout out a day users so inclined will quickly break into the top ten and then it becomes a race to post anything just to achieve a rank.. This in turn shows opuss in a poor light.. Potential investors or prospective new users looking on will see a substandard copy of twitter instead of the talented mix of opuss at its best.

@Burrfoot I don't really remember that being an issue two years ago, so why should it be now? There has always been room for anything heartfelt and original here, as long as it wasn't plagiarism, which this isn't. Yes. He has creative control, but as long as the category is there, it should be accepted as a part of Opuss. In all honesty I do believe we have more pressing issues right now, than a few tweets. There's issues with funding, and management of the app. Even the continued existence of Opuss is at stake. We should come together as a community to keep this place alive. Not splitting hairs and attacking each other. This just devides us, when we should be doing the opposite. Right now isn't the time to change Opuss; first we need to secure its survival and get funding to implement the changes need, which are impossible at present.

· 0 · 1393783144

@DuRoLuRo in the last two years this has cropped up and been dealt with several times. Spam posts and multiaccounts using the system to spam up the charts. I'm fairly sure some elements have been involved previously and have admitted to having had older accounts. In the current crop there's been several instances of blatant plagiarism, copied from fanfic.net straight onto opuss.. Word for word.. Chapter for chapter.. I agree and say it repeatedly.. Heartfelt, original, creative content is brilliant wether it's to my taste or not is irrelevant.. Posting 'hi' is none of those things. Why do you think me and others make a fuss? For me, it's because I want to keep the spirit of opuss alive and to try and ensure it's an attractive prospect for potential investors, because as you say, that's what's most important.

· 0 · 1393785386

I just think the focus should be on the real issues, rather than forbidding people to use a certain category. Purhaps one of the changes that could be made to the app, would be a frontpage with clickable categories, and masters picks. Even monthly, and yearly chart snapshots. I'm imagining something like the featured section of the appstore, where we could promote the best original creative work, to showcase the best of Opuss, and get people started figuring out this place. We could have contests and giveaways. We definitely need a better design for the app, because I don't think the current design serves justice to the platform. Opuss has so much more potential than what has been realized.

· 0 · 1393786285

@DuRoLuRo agreed.. But that's for the owners to do and hopefully after the upcoming fundraiser they can take the next steps. Realistically the only thing we can do is post, repost on social media and comment.. For me, to encourage original content, and to discourage spam. Nothing wrong with the odd tweet which has something to say.. But I'd hope you agree, opuss isn't for posting 'hi' etc

· 0 · 1393786907

@Burrfoot with that I do agreeð

· 0 · 1393788129

@ElsaofArrendale , it's not a matter of opinion, you don't own Opuss therefore you cannot decide to do what you want, Honza owns Opuss and not you, so whilst you are here you follow the rules or your a goner. @lelo and @Burrfoot are right,They have been on Opuss longer than you, we all know the rules and follow them, yet you don't, the Opuss community doesn't like people who don't follow rules, it's either disturbing or frankly annoying. I don't want your defensive comments because I really don't care. Adam is gone, his rules don't apply, Honza is here, so his do. No shoutouts, no spam, no tweets! And the section for tweets is being removed, exempt Honza is trying to fund Opuss, it takes a lot to actually run an app, the last thing on his mind would be removing a section. Many more people would actually like you and read your work if you were 'real' or not posting tweets.

· 0 · 1393791582

@Mystical ðcorrectð

· 0 · 1393791797

@lelo ððð

· 0 · 1393791988

One SHUT THE HELL UP ABOUT REALITY!!!!!!!!!! Two @DuRoLuRo is right, it shouldn't be catergory of it is not allowed.

· 0 · 1393792013

@Mystical

· 0 · 1393792021

@ElsaofArrendale Stop acting childish and grow up, Kelly, did you read those comments? Honza has no funding to do an update yet. So, for now it is there but is against the opuss rules. He has said so, you would know if you had been on opuss longer, you would have known about all of the trouble with it nearly shutting down. So Grow up and listen please. Don't tell @Mystical to shut the hell up either, Kelly. Ok, Kelly?

· 0 · 1393792487

Do you not understand privacy! It's childish to not respect human rights! Infact bullying so rethink your comment and plus, people call me not real and what am I? A ghost?! I think not so... And it's aloud when categorised I'd it's not find so. And sea monster does still own opuss as its still his name in the App Store @lelo

· 0 · 1393792935

@ElsaofArrendale Please listen and read some of Adams last posts, you will know then. And my opinion is that it is childish to pretend to be a disney character... My opinion. No, your not a ghost, rather the opposite. Just listen. It's against the rules. There's nothing you can do about it, so why fight it? Your saying that Adam still owns opuss? No, @Honza owns opuss. The least on his mind is to change the name and to listen to your rebelling against the rules. It's the rules. Seamonster sold opuss on to @Honza.

· 0 · 1393793203

And what is against your rights?

· 0 · 1393793333

@lelo @ElsaofArrendale @Mystical now girls, no need to get personal ð

· 0 · 1393794123

@Burrfoot ðð

· 0 · 1393794168

@elsaofarrendale @lelo Please stop with the personal attacks, and please no real names! It's not only childish. It's bad online conduct.

· 0 · 1393794765

@DuRoLuRo ðð

· 0 · 1393794829

@Burrfoot ðð personal is my middle name burr ððð

· 0 · 1393796539

@ElsaofArrendale and what are your human rights? You don't have any, because Elsa is not human she is cartoon, therefore you can't have human fights, sorry. Maybe if you were human you could, but your a cartoon. ðððð

· 0 · 1393796586

@Burrfoot just SHUSH. Go away. No one likes you.

· 0 · 1393815282

@fl1ppyf1sh ððð

· 0 · 1393830359

@fl1ppyf1sh true

· 0 · 1393905809

Vertalen 11 jaren geleden

Teddy

Nessie Cullen

Teddy

Nessie Cullen

Teddy

Chloe

Leah

no one

Elsa

Elsa

Teddy

Teddy

Teddy

Elsa

Teddy

Elsa

Elsa

leah

leah

Elsa

leah

leah

Elsa

DuRoLuRo

Leah

Teddy

Teddy

DuRoLuRo

Teddy

DuRoLuRo

Teddy

DuRoLuRo

â¡Amyâ¡

leah

â¡Amyâ¡

Elsa

Elsa

leah

Elsa

leah

leah

Teddy

leah

DuRoLuRo

leah

â¡Amyâ¡

â¡Amyâ¡

Juliah the Impaler

Teddy

TheGolden

â¡Amyâ¡

â¡Amyâ¡

â¡Amyâ¡

â¡Amyâ¡